{title}

Login About AIU

About AIU

 
 
 

Topics

What you're thinking!

From: Uganda's Pied Piper

Re: Uganda's Pied piper: I hate to bring this up, but the question over lack of awareness/involvement on the part of American public may require self-examination…

- GREATSTAFF

From: Red, White & Harry

Bring on your bad self! If some foraign automaker thinks they can make hay out of detroit, just let'em try We can hang with the best, our automakers…

- GREATSTAFF

From: The Poison Apple

Unfortunately, depends on your p.o.v. I don' t have the disposable income to indulge myself in every fad that comes along, ergo, I am a "late joiner"…

- GREATSTAFF

Controversy in Ads

A Trail of Blood

 
A Trail of Blood

Mark T. Edmonson

Shall you kill? The blood trail is distinct; the reasoning behind it—profound! Of course any person nowadays would understand such a gory scene as illustrated in a controversial ad by the World Wildlife Federation (WWF). Their intended objective in educating the public to conserve our wildlife can be seen as “brash,” “bold” and “daring.” But their understanding of the topic is genuine. They wish to promote a view on society that seems to be dissipating with time. The preservation of animal species is a necessity, the wait for which is all too long given lists of endangered species.

Now in this particular ad called “Don’t buy exotic animal souvenirs” we are shown a woman dressed in tropical wear, pulling along her suitcase through an airport, most notably after a serene trip outside of the country. But the trail behind her is that of blood, and in a surreal environment. The powerful message suggests that while vacationing overseas, the exotic animals are killed off by tourists. These animals succumb to unnatural deaths at the expense of profit - So, more tourists mean more dead animals.

For a conservative adult, this ad appears harsh and very pronounced. It must not be marketed in areas frequented by children because the current view of society is to “protect” children from subject matters meant exclusively for adults. However, in my opinion I applaud the WWF for introducing such brash advertisement.

There is no difference in their campaign, than in movies depicting war, violence or gore that are rated PG and PG-13. Many parents have accepted the violence and gore in the Lord of the Rings Trilogy for their underage children, so why should it bother them when an ad such as this one reaches the modern city?

This ad informs the public that there are certain activities intended for the well-being of the person, but at the expense of another, whether living or inanimate. The question here is whether or not our society is ready to accept knowledge, such as this ad, in pure conjunction to the message that exotic animal souvenirs are harvested from illegal acts that are detrimental to the survival of the animal species.

Would you buy KILLER souvenirs?

Photograph Credit:
Sabrina Segal

 

1 Comment

1. mamamarcy |Oct. 16, 2010 @ 11:43 AM

 
non-member comment
When asked if I would buy KILLER souvenirs, my answer is no. I don't believe that one needs to wear a dead animal on them to " look elegant and pretty". God has given each of us an inner beauty. The only way people will see this beauty though is if they take the blinders off, and stop looking at all of the material possessions. One more note, I AM NOT one of those parents who let approve those violent movies. My baby girl right now is 8 years old, and Joe and myself need to closely monitor what she watches. With all of the "garbage" on television today, we've had to be selective. I encourage more parents to do the same.
 

Sign-in & Let your voice be heard!







Forgot your password?
Sing-Up