{title}

Login About AIU

About AIU

 
 
 

Topics

What you're thinking!

From: Dr. Advertiser, M.D.

This was a very well written article. While I do agree with you on some of the statements I also disagree. It would be nice if there were no side…

- mariem

From: Yeah, Right

Very well written. I could not agree more there is no such thing as a "happy period" other than they confirm you are not pregnant. These ads are probably…

- mariem

From: The Killer Prius

Green is a new trend that is often viewed as boring or "hippie". Never having seen these commercials, going off of your description, it seems that…

- CWilson221

Emotional Advertising

Image is Everything

 
Image is Everything

Amelia F. Jackson

Canon used the slogan “Image is everything” in a 1990 camera commercial featuring tennis star Andre Agassi. Thirty years later, how much of this statement is true today? Does image really influence our purchase decision?

Apparently it does.

In the past few months, we have seen companies and brands such as Toyota, Tiger Woods, and Goldman Sachs try to restore their images after a big scandal or controversy. They along with the millions of companies and brands know that image is tied to the consumer perception. If the consumer has to choose between two products that provide the same benefit, the consumer will pick the one that is more reliable with higher quality.

Do we really know if a product is reliable and have a high quality before we buy it? No we do not, but this is why companies spend millions of dollars in advertising to persuade us that it does.

Image equates to consumer perception. Image is responsible for conveying corporate ideals and brand messages to the consumer. Once an image is tarnished, the chances are greater a consumer switches to a competitor. I found this to be true when a friend recently decided to purchase a new car. Unfortunately, due to the safety issues that have plagued the media about Toyota cars, my friend chose to purchase a Nissan instead. The fear that he may fall victim of the same fate that some Toyota drivers have experienced, discouraged him from buying their product.

Just think of how many other potential customers changed their minds for the same reason. If I was placed in the same situation, I probably would have done the same. Based by Bloomberg polls, 4 out of 10 Americans say they would definitely not buy a Toyota. Toyota dropped from 1 to 6 in a perceived quality study completed by Automotive Lease Guide.

In an overcrowded market, the core strategy of a company is differentiation. They must prove they are a better alternative. A company’s image is the reflection of its character. That image can help them flourish or slowly destroy them. Toyota along with other companies has learned that difficult lesson.

Do you feel differently about a company like Toyota that has been involved in a scandal?

Photograph Credit:

Sabrina Segal

 

2 Comments

1. pikle |May. 23, 2010 @ 3:58 PM

 
pikle's avatar
My definition of advertising goes like this: An emotional appeal to alter perception and/or needs and wants.
Toyota's sales actually rebound (44%) after the VP of US Sales appeared in a chat on DIGG and beat his breasts (illustratively) with the famous "mea culpa, mea culpa".
In today's language it translates into "My bad!". Implied and verbalized in the confession is the promise, "But I shall never, ever, ever put company profits above customer safety again!"
Apparently, some folks believe ... (in Toyota? miracles?)
pikle
 

2. bmcmicken |Jun. 6, 2010 @ 9:33 PM

 
bmcmicken's avatar
Interesting that public perception is so media sensitive; but media power in steering perceptions has become invaluable to companies and individuals. Consider the recent safety recall by Chrysler Corporation, the gas pedal assembly of some Dodge and Jeep vehicles have the same issues as Toyota had, see the link below (Wall Street Journal, 2010). Tiger Woods, Sachs, and many others in the public view have had similar double issues as stated here. Time heals selectively?

Is differentiation in media viewpoint a valid concern? One may wonder, as I often do. There seams to be a double standard depending on popularity or frenzied effects of previous media reporting.

I believe...

Bob McMicken

Wall Street Journal. (2010). Corporate Watch. Retrieved from the web on June 6th, 2010 from: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704002104575290892144321562.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
 

Sign-in & Let your voice be heard!







Forgot your password?
Sing-Up
 
buy Newport cigarettesbuy Camel cigarettesbuy Marlboro cigarettes